Ahead of this week's hearings, AAFA signed onto two letters – one from more than 100 trade associations representing all sectors of the economy, and another signed by 16 trade associations representing soft goods – to express our position on this issue.

 

Microfiber labeling legislation: In a move that could see a similar trend sweep across several state legislatures, Connecticut passed a bill that requires the formation of a working group to study the issue of synthetic clothing and microfiber pollution. Thanks to AAFA’s work in Connecticut, the version approved by the legislature removed a labeling requirement and other concerning language from the original bill. Meanwhile, California and New York State are both considering bills that would require extra labeling for products with synthetic fibers, identifying them as contributors to microfiber waste in waterways. Additionally, New York’s legislature is considering product labeling to encourage hand-washing of synthetic garments. AAFA is rigorously working to address controversial provisions within these bills. Members interested in the impact this legislation could have on their business are encouraged to connect with Kristen Kern.  

 

Protecting Berry Amendment provisions for footwear: On May 9, AAFA joined with more than a dozen industry groups in expressing concerns to the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) leadership with very strong opposition to anti-Berry Amendment proposals on footwear and components in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).