Print this Article | Send to Colleague
WHAT HAS PCOC DONE FOR US LATELY – BIRD
WORK:
Many pest control
companies in California perform bird abatement work in a variety of manners as
part of their regular income for residential, commercial or even government
projects. This form of work in our industry accounts for millions of dollars
annually throughout the state.
Recently, I received a
call from one of our members concerning bird work and the Contractors State
Licensing Board (CSLB). This member, who does extensive amounts of bird work
including contracts for state agencies such as CalTrans, was being told that "currently
birds were not covered under branch two for general pest and even when they
were listed the limit was catch and release not prevention. They would need to hold the D64 – Non-Specialized classification for "Bird
Abatement" through the CSLB to perform any work totaling $500 or more."
This member
had several contracts totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars they were being
told they could not perform until they received the appropriate license.
After
consulting with a few of our members and the Structural Pest Control Board (SPCB),
I sent a response email. Note: I have removed the names from the email for this
article including the member involved.
I
am with the Pest Control Operators of California. We are the trade association
for the pest control industry in California and have been consulting with the
Structural Pest Control Board regarding this issue. I received an email from
[one of our members] regarding a response you sent him on bird work and what a
branch 2 general pest control licensed company can do....
Branch
2 general pest control licensed companies have historically been empowered
through the Structural Pest Control Board to perform bird abatement work without
any additional licenses including the C-61/D-64 Non-Specific contractor’s
license category. The most prominent code supporting this is B&P Code 8505
in the Structural Pest Control Act where it defines what structural pest
control is which includes "the making of contracts, or the submitting of bids
for, or the performance of any work including the making of structural repairs
or replacements, or the use of insecticides, pesticides, rodenticides,
fumigants, or allied chemicals or substances, or mechanical devices for
the purpose of eliminating, exterminating, controlling or preventing
infestations or infections of such pests, or organisms.
‘Household pests’ are defined for the purpose of this chapter as those pests
other than wood destroying pests or organisms, which invade household
structures and other structures, including, but not limited to, rodents,
vermin and insects."
I
added the underlines for emphasis. Since the structural pest control act
(and 8505 in particular) was first promulgated in the 1930s, Branch 2
licensees have been empowered to perform both reactive and preventative
controls to address vermin such as birds, bats and other vertebrate and
invertebrate pests. At the heart of controlling pests (especially vertebrate
pests) has always included the installation of mechanical devices, correcting
and changing architectural features that favor harborage or access.
Regardless
as to if the individual performing bird control is a branch 2 licensee or a
contractor with a D64 non-specialized classification, they would still need to
be in compliance with all other state and federal laws governing birds and
other vertebrate animals.
The licensing requirements from the CSLB do not apply to Pest Control Licensees performing work under the scope of their license as spelled out in B&P Code 7051 which is under the contractor's section of the B&P code:
This chapter does not apply to a licensed architect or a registered civil or professional engineer acting solely in his or her professional capacity or to a licensed structural pest control operator acting within the scope of his or her license or a licensee operating within the scope of the Geologist and Geophysicist Act.
Back
in 2003, the CSLB had agreed with the Structural
Pest Control Board (SPCB) position that Branch 2 licensees can continue to
install bird control and exclusion devices as we have done in the past — see
the Structural Pest Control Board minutes from July 18, 2003 where it states:
"Contractors State License Board (CSLB) has been contacted regarding issuance
of licenses in a special category for bird control. CSLB agreed to provide a
list of those licensees; who will be contacted and informed they have to be
licensed by the Structural Pest Control Board if they practice pigeon control."
Up
until just recently, a person performing bird work for pigeons had to be a
Branch 2 general pest control licensed individual under B&P Code 8555(g).
Since the Merrifield v. Lockyer case, this section was overturned, but this
overturning does not exclude branch 2 companies from performing such work.
I
was able to speak with the Executive Officer and Assistance Executive Officer
of the Structural Pest Control Board in regards to this issue. They have agreed
that branch 2 licensees should be able to perform bird control work as under
the definitions of B&P Code 8505, and if you wish for confirmation, you may
contact them.
Thank You
At first, we received resistance from
the CSLB, so I informed the SPCB. The Assistant Executive Officer from the SPCB
met with a representative from the CSLB to defend our position. After this meeting, I received an
email from the CSLB agreeing that Branch 2 pest control operators are exempt
from the D-64 license under B&P Code 7051.
These are the sorts of things PCOC
does for the pest control industry to help protect our businesses and way of
life.
I would like to thank Eric
Paulsen from Clark Pest Control for all of his help and expertise on this
matter. I would also like to thank Robert Lucas from the Structural Pest
Control Board for his involvement in resolving this issue. |