EVP NOTES — VOODOO ECONOMICS
Print this Article | Send to Colleague
Thirty-five years ago, George H.W. Bush coined the phrase "Voodoo
Economics," referring to Presidential rival, Ronald Reagan. The term survived
and, in fact, haunted Reagan for years to come. Bush, of course, became
his vice president.
The California Legislature is riddled with examples of
Voodoo economics: logic and fact challenging assertions about economic
effects...usually tied to a legislator’s pet project. A couple of examples
immediately spring to mind: the backers of Governor Brown’s two pet public
works projects: twin water tunnels and a north south bullet train, make
extravagant and logic-free claims. The same could be said about the claims made
by the backers of decarbonizing the California economy: that it would have
hugely positive benefits while discounting the effects on consumers.
Anyway, you see my point in all of this. The same is going
on regarding a very important issue to PCOC that will affect small business in
the state significantly: namely, imposing a sales tax on services. In the
1930s, with property tax revenue declining because of the Great Depression,
states began taxing the sales of items. Eight of the 45 states that collect
sales tax impose that sales tax on around twenty service categories. The
supporters of a sales tax on services point to a huge revenue increase to the
state that can be used for civic minded projects such as education and health
insurance. The problem that this kind of argument ignores, and why it can be
classified as voodoo economics, is the huge offsetting negative effects that
such a tax change would have on economic growth, both from a business and a
consumer standpoint.
Yes, voodoo economics is alive and well in California. It is
up to organizations, such as PCOC, to keep elected officials honest when they
pontificate on things they know nothing about. |