One of the decisions we will all have to make (again!) in
the near future on the statewide ballot, is whether California should return to
a part-time legislature. Some states have never gone to a full-time
legislature, as California did in the early 1960s. Texas (a big state), Oregon
and Nevada, for instance, all meet every two years.
States which have a part-time legislature encourage more of
a ‘citizen legislator’ (i.e. not many lawyers!) – those states do not pay their
elected officials very much either. By comparison, the California Legislature
comprises of over 60 percent lawyers and their total pay, including per diem, is more than $200,000 a year.
The size of the legislature is also a concern: the Speaker
of the Assembly has over 200 people working for him. In part-time states, they
have very few staff.
The argument goes, however, that California has just become
too complex to move to a part-time legislature. That we need a legislative body
that meets every year, to deal with a state government which administers an
economy that is sixth or seventh in the world (depending on the
price of the Euro at the time, we vie with France). We also need the staff
support to function.
Many of you have heard me refer to Sacramento as ‘Disneyland
North’ – where everyone gets taken for a ride. Also, that the type of person
who runs for office in California has never had to write on the front of a
paycheck or hold a payroll down on a Friday, wondering whether there is enough
money to pay everyone. Moving to a part-time legislature may help solve some of
these problems and it is certainly an appealing concept in theory.
After all, maybe a part-time legislature would not have the
time to pass laws which burden small business owners and are sometimes too
complicated to understand. The legislature would only have the time to focus on
the most important things in life rather than playing around in other people’s
business. Do you sense frustration here?! One alternative might be to have just
a budget session in the off year.....we shall have to see how this all shakes
out....stay tuned!
For
PCOC Legislative Agenda 2015, please click here.
APPLICATORS’
RETESTING WAITING PERIOD REDUCED
At the
October Structural Pest Control Board meeting in Sacramento, PCOC along with
other stakeholders petitioned the Structural Pest Control Board to reduce the
re-testing wait period for applicators. The initial standard period for a
reexamination after the reexamination application was delivered was 30 days.
The
Structural Board looked into the matter and as of October 16, 2015, the wait
period has been reduced to 15 days, allowing potential licensees to take the
test more often. This is a huge win for the industry, and we at PCOC want to
thank the Structural Pest Control Board for hearing our plight and reacting
quickly after the board meeting. We especially want to thank Susan Saylor, the
executive officer of the Structural Pest Control Board, for all her efforts to
quickly facilitate the matter.
A
HEART FELT GOODBYE
By the time this article goes out, I
will no longer be the Director of Membership and Technical Services at PCOC. Another
opportunity presented itself within our industry, and I have taken a position
with North American Home Services as head of their Pest Department.
I would like to thank all the
individuals in the industry that have been such a huge help to myself and PCOC in
general. So many of you have been great resources of information and have taken
the time to help better the industry and myself. I have learned so much from so
many and have also come to consider so many of you my friends, and I will be
happy to still be involved with PCOC as a member. This industry means so much,
and I have really gotten to see how so many supposed competitors come together
to not only achieve common goals, but to genuinely help and support each other.
I know that you will show the same courtesy and helpfulness to whomever
replaces me.
Thanks again
to you all.
2015
Board of Directors Meeting — December 11-12, 2015
Welcome to a new section of Newsbriefs! Here, we will give news from our members: new hires, retirements, etc. If you have some news you would like to share, please send a short sentence or two to breann@pcoc.org.
Click here for more details.
The Workplace Safety Gender Gap
According to recent
data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the number of fatal work injuries
among women rose 12.5 percent in 2014. Still, only 8 percent of all fatal
occupational injuries involved women. As in prior years, men accounted for 92
percent of all fatal occupational injuries.
Why is that? First,
many of the most dangerous occupations, including roofing and construction, are
dominated by men. Women who work in those industries often work in clerical or
other less risky positions.
Men also account for
more traffic fatalities. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that
transportation accidents continued to lead the causes of workplace fatalities
in 2014. Transportation injuries accounted for 40 percent of fatal workplace
fatalities. The majority of these fatalities were caused on roadways involving
motorized land vehicles.
Men tend to account
for more driving-related accidents in general, whether work-related or not.
Employers can help address this risk by providing driver safety courses and
encouraging all employees to attend and by screening anyone who will drive on
the job for their driver safety records. For further assistance in improving
safety at your worksite, please contact the Programs Department at EPIC,
Edgewood Partners Insurance Center, at (800)
234-6363 or visit epicbrokers.com
What Safety Regulations Apply to Your Business?
When it comes to workplace safety, ignorance is no defense.
OSHA safety and health regulations often apply to all businesses, regardless of
size.
If you’re not sure of which regulations apply to your
business, OSHA provides some resources. It has created a Web-based step-by-step
guide to help small employers identify some of the regulations that might apply
to them. You can find this OSHA Compliance Assistance Quick Start at
https://www.osha.gov/dcsp/compliance_assistance/quickstarts/index.html.
OSHA also offers employers an on-site consultation service.
Trained state government staff will visit your site and provide free advice.
The service is completely separate from any enforcement programs that OSHA
operates, and is entirely confidential. Sessions identify and uncover potential
workplace hazards and are intended to help small business owners improve their
workplace safety and health systems.
If that isn’t sufficient incentive, then this might be — you
could qualify for a one-year exemption from routine OSHA inspections if you
participate! Find out more at
https://www.osha.gov/dcsp/smallbusiness/consult.html.
For more information or assistance with safety and
compliance issues, please contact the PCOC Insurance Program Department at
EPIC, (877) 860-7378 or visit www.pcocinsurance.com.
FULL NAME
COMPANY
DISTRICT |
MEMBER TYPE |
JOIN DATE |
REFERRED BY |
Joshua J. Adams |
S |
11/6/2015 |
|
North
American Home Services |
|
|
|
BIGVALLEY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Daywalt |
A |
11/6/2015 |
|
Fleetmatics |
|
|
|
BAYAREA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Ray G. Teel |
R |
11/2/2015 |
|
Mountain
Valley Pest Control |
|
|
|
CENTRAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ricardo Guerrero |
R |
10/22/2015 |
Leslie
Nulick |
RG Tech Pest
Control, Inc. |
|
|
|
CENTRAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Richard Kravetz |
R |
10/20/2015 |
Lesile
Nulick |
Double Eagle
Pest Control |
|
|
|
CENTRAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Kevin McKay |
R |
10/26/2015 |
|
Kevins
Termite |
|
|
|
SHASTA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Williams |
R |
11/2/2015 |
|
Thomasson
Pest Control |
|
|
|
CENTRAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|