District Court Dismisses California Meal and Rest Break Claims Based on FMCSA Order.

On May 3, 2019, in the case of Anthony Ayala v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, the U.S. Central District Court of California dismissed a California plaintiff's meal and rest break claim on the basis that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's December 21, 2018 Order preempted California's meal-and-rest break laws.

The FMCSA's December 21, 2018 Order determined that California's meal-and-rest break laws 1) have no safety benefit beyond those already provided by the FMCSA, 2) are incompatible with federal hours of service regulations, and 3) cause an unreasonable burden on interstate commerce. The Court in Ayala v. U.S. Xpress held that the FMCSA's Order is binding unless overturned by a federal appeals court. The Court further held that it has no jurisdiction to reverse the FMCSA Order and dismissed Plaintiff's meal rest break claims on that basis.

Currently there are four separate appeals filed in U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals challenging the FMCSA's Order.

Article Provided by CTA Member Chauvel & Glatt, LLP: Chauvel and Glatt, LLP is based in San Mateo, California, and serves the Peninsula and surrounding communities, as well as clients throughout the State of California. They’ve been providing legal services for more than 30 years and specialize in the fields of Business Law, Real Estate Law, Employment Law, Estate Planning/Probate, Transportation Law, and Intellectual Property Law. They bring a wide range of knowledge and experience. Their attorneys enjoy working collaboratively and strive to keep matters as simple as possible. They share a desire to give you unparalleled customer service by being pro-active and responsive to all your needs.