|
||||
Are You Getting Answers from Your Safety Software?Print this Article | Send to Colleague By Griffin Schultz Software has been transforming people's lives since shortly after the 1950s when mathematician John Tukey first coined the term. Along the way, it has produced countless dollars of return on investment (ROI) to companies that have successfully deployed application software across their various business functions - and safety is no different. But organizations generally obtain a higher ROI from their safety software investments by demanding not just efficiency and automation, but also answers to their most difficult questions. Usually, more advanced software that employs advanced and predictive analytics are required to provide these answers. According to an article written by Joe McKendrick from Informatica, a recent survey by the Economist Intelligence Unit found that organizations that take the lead in data analytics are three times more likely to be leaders within their industry groups than companies with standard analytics environments. So, are you getting answers, or just automation and efficiency from your software investment? Let's address this question by taking safety inspection and observation software as an example. The Analytics Pyramid As adoption of these solutions increase, short-lived will be the days of clipboards, pens and paper in the field or on the shop floor, or toiling for hours in Excel trying to get your pivot table to present your data in a format to which your CEO and frontline workers can relate. The automation of both the data collection and reporting processes creates great efficiencies across safety functions. However, all this automation and efficiency often just frees up a safety manager's time. With this new found time, they are still confronted with trying to find an answer to the all-important question, "Where and when will our next injury occur?" To answer this, safety software must move beyond automation. Rather than just employing simple data access and reporting functionality, it must leverage advanced and predictive analytics. The graphic below, adapted from the book Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning by Thomas Davenport and Jeanne Harris, explores this idea further. It shows the different questions that can be addressed when using various levels of reporting and analytics. The more basic questions are addressed by functionality represented in the blue section of the pyramid (simple data access and reporting), while the more complicated questions are addressed in the gold section using advanced and predictive analytics. If all your organization is trying to do is report on what has recently occurred and thus answer the questions at the bottom of the pyramid, then most safety software systems focused on automation and efficiency will serve your needs well. However, if you are trying be proactive and get to the top of the pyramid by predicting "what will happen next" and then optimizing your response to ensure the outcome you achieve is "the best that can happen," then you will need to employ more advanced and predictive analytics. A Personal Finance Example However, only a few of these solutions can predict your financial future. Some of the more advanced analytics solutions allow the user to plug in key financial data - like current income, expected future income growth, personal savings rate, current and future debt obligations, assumed interest rates, etc. - and the system will predict whether or not you will reach your retirement savings goals. Others allow you to enter similar data plus your retirement goals, and then will propose an optimized savings rate over time. Regardless of which method is employed, more advanced and predictive analytics must be leveraged to answer these questions at the top of the pyramid and predict and optimize your personal financial future. Do Advanced Analytics Return More Value?
Software systems employing advanced and predictive analytics capabilities have been deployed across safety functions with similarly dramatic results. Based on research done in connection with Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) in Pittsburgh, it has been statistically proven, using four years of real-world safety data, that workplace injuries can be predicted with accuracy rates as high as 97 percent. It has also been proven across numerous companies, that if injuries can be predicted, they can be prevented - here are some examples:
These companies went beyond just automating their data collection and reporting processes and employed advanced and predictive analytics functionality to find answers to their toughest questions. Conclusion If advanced and predictive analytics can be effectively used by casinos and zoos, they should certainly be considered to help ensure that every employee goes home safe every day. The humanistic and hard-dollar ROI from such an investment will no doubt be worth it. Griffin Schultz is the general manager of Predictive Solutions Corporation (formerly DBO2) an Industrial Scientific company. Predictive Solutions predicts workplace injuries so its customers can prevent them. He can be reached at gschultz@predictivesolutions.com. |
||||
Associated General Contractors of America 2300 Wilson Blvd, Suite 300 Arlington, VA, USA Ph: 703-548-3118 Fax: 703-837-5402 |