A Recent Decision of the Divisional Court
Print this Article | Send to Colleague
- Review their Collective Agreement, internal policies and document the policy of whether or not a construction worker is paid to drive to and from a construction project or staging area (like in the Interpaving case) to minimize similar WSIB, financial and legal risk.
- Review and update all employer’s safety policy, fit for duty policy, and driving a company vehicle policy (yes, he rolled the company truck), and ensure a strict "zero tolerance” policy and prohibition of all workers driving while under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
- Training and documentation of the training of all construction workers on items 1 and 2 above, including supervisors and management is critical.
- Object to and appeal all WSIB claims where a worker is injured when they are in violation of 1. or 2. Above, with competent legal counsel (the first hearing is the most important to win).
- Consider putting together an industry working group to lobby the Ontario Government to amend the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act to prevent a worker who is injured as a result of their consumption of alcohol or drugs, whether or not they are in the course of employment or when driving to and from a construction project or staging area, from entitlement of WSIB benefits.
Should anyone want to discuss this case, please feel free to reach out to Norm Keith.