The lawsuit includes claims that the proxy statement provided to Smurfit-Stone shareholders in connection with the transaction contained misleading or inadequate disclosures regarding the merger. Plaintiffs sought damages and a preliminary injunction to enjoin the shareholder vote to approve and adopt the merger agreement. This past May 20, the court denied the plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction. On May 27, Smurfit-Stone's shareholders voted to approve the transaction, and the merger was consummated later that day.
In the counterclaim filed this past week, RockTenn notified the court of an error in the proxy statement provided to Smurfit-Stone shareholders in connection with the transaction. The error was the attachment and summary of an outdated version of the Delaware appraisal statute, rather than the current version. RockTenn requested that the court order that plaintiffs are not entitled to any damages or the imposition of any other remedy with respect to this error.
TAPPI
http://www.tappi.org/